Restaurant Review: The Shed

Let the choir of angels sing: I have found good barbeque in the south! Between the nasty, how-does-the-health-department-not-shut-this-place-down horror of Anjac's to the gut wrenching disaster Hog Heaven, I thought I'd have to go back to the midwest or open my own restaurant to get good bbq. Thankfully I was wrong!

I should have gone here first. This place has been on the Food Network. They sent Diners, Drive-ins and Dives to this place. They've won awards. But then again, Anjac's claims to have won awards too, and that place is nasty. Ok. Let me start from the beginning. There's a food truck down on the beach, owned and operated by The Shed, a local bbq join. I have no problem with food trucks, hell, I'd open one myself if I could afford it. But after so many bad experiences with southern bbq, I really did not want to go here.

First of all, the price? At this truck at least, you cannot beat it. I think it came out to about $10 for a sandwich and 2 sides. And these sandwiches were not small; I'm a big guy and I thought they were damn near huge. Gotta say the portion size was much better than Hog Heaven. I didn't even eat the bun. It wasn't necessary. The meat was so tender and juicy even without the sauce. THIS is what really well done brisket is supposed to taste like. No fat at all, oh it was beautiful. I could have eaten 5 pounds of it and not batted an eye. The sauce was even great, and I think they sell it by the bottle.

I didn't even care about the sides. I got the beans and potato salad. The beans were very good, and obviously home made. I'm not a fan of southern potato salad though. I prefer mustard in my potato salad and they don't do that here. I can't hold that against them; it's just my own personal taste. The only thing that could have made this meal better would've been fries or onion rings. But it was a food truck so maybe not.

And since it was on the beach, you couldn't beat the view.

Quick update

Ok, I apparently have been receiving a lot of visitors, so I figure I should at least update once in awhile. I meant to try a positive review for once, just to see if I can actually do it, but I recently developed TMJ and my jaw feels like someone hit me in the face with a baseball bat. So once it heals, I hope I'll be able to get another video up. Maybe I can find my real camera and stop with the bad webcam videos.

Anyway, the next review will hopefully be coming soon. See you guys later, I gotta go ice my jaw.

Restaurant Review 2: Hog Heaven.

Shitty video time! Seriously though, sorry about the guerrilla style photography and poor sound and lighting; I'm on my webcam again because I don't know where the charger is for my normal camera.

Caution: I swear alot.

V-log 1/8/11 A few games

Please excuse the guerrilla style videography; I'm recording on my webcam and this is my first video ever. So there are a lot of um's and pauses in here.  

 

Mini Review: Back to the Future: The Game

Allow me a bit of a fan boy squee of delight. Not only that this game got made, but that it's not shitty. <fanboy>SQUEEEEEE</fanboy>

Seriously though, this game is really good. The voice acting is superb, Christopher Lloyd is back as Doc Brown and it's like they just wrapped 3 yesterday. He fell right back into character and it's great. AJ as Marty is...well to paraphrase Christopher Lloyd: if I didn't know that it wasn't Michael J. Fox, I'd swear it was. He is that good.

The writing is great; of course, they had Bob Gale, the co-creator of the series, as a creative consultant and from the interviews I've seen, he had a fair amount of input. Everybody at Telltale Games did an outstanding job of capturing the spirit of the classic trilogy and putting it into the game.

I was a little worried about the art direction, when I first saw previews and screen shots and what not; it looks cartoony, but it works. I really like the way the game looks, plays and sounds. I cannot wait until February for the next installment. In short, if you're a gamer and you like Back to the Future, buy this game!

Mini Rant

God damn it! WoW: Cataclysm has been out for what, three days and I'm already tired of this shit. If you're like me, and patronize a good deal of gaming related sites (i.e. spoonyexperiment.com or escapistmagazine.com) and watch a lot of videos on said sites, you've seen the ad for this fucking waste of life about a billion times already.

Look, Blizzard, I get it. LotR:O going free to play has really hurt you, so you're trying to something you claim is game-changing but really just seems to turn a crapsack world into an even bigger dung-heap. God I hate this fucking game. I've already bitched at length about it, and I'm sure Cataclysm won't make any difference to me, although I'm also sure that at one point, I'll be fucking bored enough or drunk enough to re-download this fucking vapid waste of time and try it out yet again only to be pissed off again at how utterly pointless and cartoony the whole fucking thing is and come on here to bitch about it.

Bottome line: stop eye-fucking me Blizzard! I get that you've got a new waste of time and money out, but I'm still not going to buy it.

Highlander: There Should Have Been Only One

I'm a nerd, in case you haven't noticed by reading this utter rambling crap. That's why it's odd that I've never seen the movie "Highlander" until recently. I knew next to nothing going into this movie other than the long sad list of crappy sequels, usually bitched about by The Spoony One. I'll admit, his bitching about the shitty sequels are what inspired me to watch the original and you know what? It's a damn good movie. Now I wish I had taken part in the Highlander battles while I was still participating in Dagorhir.

Anyway, the tagline for the first movie was "In the end, there can be only one." How does one make a sequel to that? It's built into the movie that there can't be a sequel without some serious retconning or ad-libbing. It could be done, and much better than how they did it, which I'll get to later.

For those of you who haven't seen Highlander, I'll give you the skinny: it follows Conner Macleod, played by Christopher Lambert. Is it weird that a Frenchman is playing a Scotsman? Yep. And yes, I've heard the complaints that Lambert doesn't do a Scottish accent, but he does during the flashbacks to Conner's past. It's not great but the dude tries. It makes sense for him not to do an accent during the present day segments; seriously, if I'm an immortal I'm going to try to lose my accent asap to try and be inconspicuous. Anyway, we see Conner hack some dude's head off in Madison Square Gardens. Yes, that's the opening to the movie. We don't know who the fuck this dude is, or the guy he's fighting with a katana or why they're fighting. Pretty badass scene to be honest, but after Macleod takes the guy's head, he experiences the quickening. We don't know what that is, for all we know, Macleod just blew up. Then we flash back to Conner's past. Get used to this. We flash back quite a lot to important events in his life.

The first flashback we see how Macleod became immortal. Pretty simple. He was a Scottish highlander (hence the title) and his clan went to war in 1536. He was killed by another immortal, The Kurrgan and comes back as an immortal himself. Then we see another odd casting choice in Ramirez. Sean Connery is always awesome, but let's face it. He's a Scotsman, playing an Egyptian masquerading as a Spaniard. Weird. Ramirez is Obi-wan to Macleod's Skywalker. He's the older trainer that explains everything to not only Conner, but to us. Immortals cannot die, except by severing their heads, they cannot have children, they do not fight on holy ground and when the time comes, they compete for the mysterious Prize. All the immortals duke it out until only one remains and that one is the winner.

The rest of the movie shows The Kurgan killing lots of immortals and flashbacks to more of Conner's life. Then we get the obligatory ginormous battle between Macleod and The Kurgan ending in The Kurgan's beheading and Conner winning the Prize, which turns out to be unlimited knowledge and power, as well as a normal mortal life and the ability to bear children. All in all, a good movie, well shot and including characters that we actually care about, which is rare among today's movies.

I'm not going to touch on the sequels here, if you want to know about those abominations visit The Spoony Experiment. I will voice my opinions on how a sequel should have been done. Sure, the first movie's favorite line was there can be only one. But a sequel could have been done if they put a bit of brain power into it. First we have to inject a bit of bullshit though. Show Conner on his death bed. He's recounting the events of the first movie to a friend of his, who we focus on more than normal, establishing that he's our new hero. Hell you could use Adrian Paul as the new guy; he's a swordsman, attractive, and hell, they used him in the later sequels as well as the series. He doesn't need to be a Macleod; although it could be possible if we establish him as Conner's son. After Conner dies, our new guy, who we'll go ahead and call Duncan since I've already got Adrian Paul in my head for this, leaves the funeral bummed out by the loss of his friend/possible father. On the way home he is killed in a car accident and we witness the quickening of a new immortal.

We witness his utter shock at waking up in a morgue and his starting out as an immortal, meeting other new immortals and explaining what he learned from Conner and eventually we see the game begin anew and the immortals coming together to battle for the Prize.

Sure, it's not a great movie, but by God it's better than Highlander 2: The Quickening isn't it?